Over-optimized on the past
A strategy tuned repeatedly on historical prices can look remarkable there and lose its edge on new observations.
An impressive equity curve doesn't tell the whole story. We examine written strategy rules or existing backtests for hidden weaknesses: overfitting, data leakage, trading costs and execution assumptions. You get a focused technical report.
Areas we investigate — not claims about your strategy's results.
MetaTrader 5 and TradingView are powerful testing platforms. Still, strong historical figures alone don't establish that a strategy will withstand unseen data, realistic costs or a different market environment.
A strategy tuned repeatedly on historical prices can look remarkable there and lose its edge on new observations.
Spread, slippage, commissions and unrealistic order fills can turn a promising model into something different.
Lookahead, candle timing mistakes and accounting errors can distort the entire backtest report.
A bounded technical review with transparent assumptions, not another black-box performance claim.
Describe entries, exits, risk and market — or share an existing report. No brokerage credentials needed.
We confirm the research question, historical data and scope in writing before accepting the order.
We check applicable fees, fill models and, where the data allow, genuinely separate testing from optimization.
You receive findings, available statistics, important limitations and practical next investigation steps.
Choose exactly one of the two technical services, with scope agreed in advance.
Bring a clear strategy idea. We test a limited set of historical conditions where the rules and data allow.
Your EA, Pine strategy or backtest looks profitable? We'll review selected reliability concerns rather than relying only on a chart.
€149 covers one agreed option, not both. Complex portfolios, proprietary datasets and large development tasks require separate scoping. Final pricing and applicable VAT are confirmed in writing before work starts.
MetaTrader 5 and TradingView already provide sophisticated strategy testers, including execution and cost settings. We don't replace their engines. We independently question the interpretation: Were parameters optimized on the same history? Was a genuine holdout used? Would less optimistic assumptions change the answer?
Compare the methods →An independent technical perspective
Transparent rules, assumptions and data
Appropriate validation and cost sensitivity checks
A clear separation of supported findings from open questions
If a strategy meets demanding, pre-agreed historical quality criteria, we can consider building a limited trading bot without an extra development fee, on a technically supported platform.
Submit for an initial check ↗You don't need to have a bot. Send your trading rules or describe why an existing report looks suspicious. We'll discuss feasibility in writing before you order.
Request a strategy check ↗ Technical research on historical data. Simulations are not verified live trading results; we do not manage trading accounts.No. You can describe unambiguous entry, exit and risk rules in writing if suitable historical data exist.
Yes, within an agreed technical scope and where suitable reports, settings or code are available. Support for a particular implementation must be verified first.
Only if the agreed research design has data genuinely untouched by strategy selection or tuning. We never label reused data as an independent holdout.
One scoped strategy test OR one audit of an existing backtest, with written technical findings. Data feasibility and final VAT treatment are confirmed first.
Only for strategies meeting the pre-disclosed historical quality, risk and technical feasibility conditions of the optional promotion. Third-party running costs are separate.
SAB Security offers technical backtest audits of trading bots and historical tests of clearly written trading strategies. Our scoped review covers relevant risks such as overfitting, lookahead bias, data quality, commissions, slippage and execution assumptions. You can send strategy rules without coding an EA or Pine Script. Each €149 service includes a written technical report with findings and limitations.